Authors
Tyler Doggett
University of Vermont
Abstract
I distinguish several arguments Kamm and Scanlon make against Taurek's claim that it is permissible to save smaller groups of people rather than larger. I then argue that none succeeds. This is a companion to my "Saving the Few."
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.26556/jesp.v3i3.36
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 64,132
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

What We Owe to Each Other.Thomas Scanlon - 1998 - Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
What We Owe to Each Other.Thomas Scanlon - 2002 - Mind 111 (442):323-354.
Should the Numbers Count?John Taurek - 1977 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 6 (4):293-316.
Fairness.John Broome - 1991 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 91:87 - 101.

View all 26 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Saving the Few.Tyler Doggett - 2013 - Noûs 47 (2):302-315.
Contractualism.Jussi Suikkanen - 2020 - Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Giving Each Person Her Due: Taurek Cases and Non-Comparative Justice.Alan Thomas - 2012 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 15 (5):661-676.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2011-01-12

Total views
106 ( #102,860 of 2,454,690 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #303,745 of 2,454,690 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes