Methods for the bias adjustment of meta-analyses of published observational studies

Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 19 (4):653-657 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Publication Bias: The Achilles' Heel of Systematic Reviews?Carole J. Torgerson - 2006 - British Journal of Educational Studies 54 (1):89 - 102.
Interpretation of tests of heterogeneity and bias in meta‐analysis.John P. A. Ioannidis - 2008 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 14 (5):951-957.
Adjusting for publication bias: modelling the selection process.Carrol Preston, Deborah Ashby & Rosalind Smyth - 2004 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 10 (2):313-322.
Is meta-analysis the platinum standard of evidence?Jacob Stegenga - 2011 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 42 (4):497-507.
An illustrated guide to the methods of meta‐analysis.Alexander J. Sutton, Keith R. Abrams & David R. Jones - 2001 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 7 (2):135-148.
The case for failed meta‐analyses.C. David Naylor - 1995 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 1 (2):127-130.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-24

Downloads
34 (#459,882)

6 months
7 (#418,426)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references