More Light? Opportunities and Pitfalls in Digitalized Psychotherapy Process Research


While the evidence on the effectiveness of different psychotherapies is often strong, it is not settled whereby and how these therapies work. Knowledge on the causal factors and change mechanisms is of high clinical and public relevance, as it contributes to the empirically informed advancement of psychotherapeutic interventions. Here, digitalized research approaches might possess the potential to generate new insights into human behavior change, contributing to augmented interventions and mental healthcare practices with better treatment outcomes. In this perspective article, we describe recent findings of research into change mechanisms that were only feasible with digital tools and outline important future directions for this rather novel branch of research. Furthermore, we indicate several challenges and pitfalls that are to be solved, in order to advance digitalized psychotherapy process research, both methodologically and technologically.

Download options


    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 72,856

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library


Added to PP

2 (#1,460,116)

6 months
1 (#386,016)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

The Logic of Scientific Discovery.K. Popper - 1959 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 10 (37):55-57.
The Logical Structure of the World.Rudolf Carnap - 1967 - Berkeley: University of California Press.
Machine Learning's Feet of Clay.Levente Kriston - 2020 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 26 (1):373-375.

Add more references

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Psychotherapy, Placebos, and Informed Consent.Garson Leder - 2021 - Journal of Medical Ethics 47 (7):444-447.
The Validity of Psychotherapy.B. A. Farrell - 1972 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 15 (1-4):146 – 170.