Rethinking the Ontological Argument: A Neoclassical Theistic Response

Cambridge University Press (2006)

Authors
Daniel Dombrowski
Seattle University
Abstract
In recent years, the ontological argument and theistic metaphysics have been criticised by philosophers working in both the analytic and continental traditions. Responses to these criticisms have primarily come from philosophers who make use of the traditional, and problematic, concept of God. In this volume, Daniel A. Dombrowski defends the ontological argument against its contemporary critics, but he does so by using a neoclassical or process concept of God, thereby strengthening the case for a contemporary theistic metaphysics. Relying on the thought of Charles Hartshorne, he builds on Hartshorne's crucial distinction between divine existence and divine actuality, which enables neoclassical defenders of the ontological argument to avoid the familiar criticism that the argument moves illegitimately from an abstract concept to concrete reality. His argument, thus, avoids the problems inherent in the traditional concept of God as static.
Keywords Theism  Process theology  God Proof, Ontological
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2009, 2011
Buy the book $28.16 used (73% off)   $31.66 new (70% off)   $103.00 direct from Amazon    Amazon page
Call number BD555.D67 2006
ISBN(s) 9780521326353   9780521863698
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 39,566
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Homer, Competition, and Sport.Daniel A. Dombrowski - 2012 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 39 (1):33-51.
Oppy, Infinity, and the Neoclassical Concept of God.Daniel A. Dombrowski - 2007 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 61 (1):25 - 37.
Rival Concepts of God and Rival Versions of Mysticism.Daniel A. Dombrowski - 2010 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 68 (1-3):153-165.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

What Does the Second Form of the Ontological Argument Prove?H. Jong Kim - 2004 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 56 (1):17 - 40.
The Ontological Argument: A Research Bibliography.T. L. Miethe - 1977 - Modern Schoolman 54 (2):148-166.
The Ontological Argument.Graham Oppy - 2008 - In Paul Copan & Chad V. Meister (eds.), Philosophy of Religion: Classic and Contemporary Issues. Blackwell.
Does the Ontological Argument Beg the Question?P. J. McGrath - 1994 - Religious Studies 30 (3):305 - 310.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
100 ( #71,658 of 2,325,500 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #523,443 of 2,325,500 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature