Environmental Ethics 10 (3):251-258 (1988)
Environmental holism has been accused of being totalitarian because it subsumes the interests and rights of individuals under the good of the whole biosphere, thus rejecting humanistic ethics. Whether this is true depends on the type of holism in question. Only an extreme form of holism leads to this totalitarian approach, and that type of holism should be rejected, not alone because it leads to unacceptable practices, but because it is too abstract and reductionistic to be an adequate basis for ethics
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Holism Without Meaning: A Critical Review of Fodor and Lepore's Holism: A Shopper's Guide.Christopher Gauker - 1993 - Philosophical Psychology 6 (4):441-49.
Social Groups, Explanation and Ontological Holism.Paul Sheehy - 2003 - Philosophical Papers 32 (2):193-224.
Epistemological Holism and Semantic Holism.William Cornwell - 2002 - In Yves Bouchard (ed.), Perspectives on Coherentism. Aylmar, Quebec: Editions du Scribe. pp. 17-33.
Semantic Holism is Here to Stay.Johannes L. Brandl - 1993 - In Grazer Philosophische Studien. Amsterdam: Rodopi. pp. 1-16.
Moderate Holism and the Instability Thesis.Henry Jackman - 1999 - American Philosophical Quarterly 36 (4):361-69.
Teaching Holism in Environmental Ethics.Michael P. Nelson - 2010 - Environmental Ethics 32 (1):33-49.
Conceptual Foundations for Environmental Ethics: A Daoist Perspective.Karyn L. Lai - 2003 - Environmental Ethics 25 (3):247-266.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads15 ( #314,103 of 2,168,151 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #127,274 of 2,168,151 )
How can I increase my downloads?