The problem of mooted models for analyses of microbiome causality

Biology and Philosophy 34 (6):1-6 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Lynch, Parke, and O’Malley highlight the need for better evaluative criteria for causal explanations in microbiome research. They propose new interventionist criteria, show that paradigmatic examples of microbiome explanations are flawed using those criteria, and suggest numerous ways microbiome explanations can be improved. While we endorse their primary criticisms and suggestions for improvements in microbiome research, we make several observations regarding the use of mooted causal models in microbiome research that have significant implications for their overall argument. In sum, we contend that their critique is too modest and that even flawed causal inferences like those they criticize can be valuable for generating better causal models and evaluating explanatory outcomes in individual cases.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 86,168

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Can communities cause?Christopher Hunter Lean - 2019 - Biology and Philosophy 34 (6):59.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-12-22

Downloads
19 (#653,783)

6 months
5 (#191,006)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Justin Donhauser
Bowling Green State University
Sara Worley
Bowling Green State University
Michael Bradie
University of Hawaii

Citations of this work

How to make value-driven climate science for policy more ethical.Justin Donhauser - 2021 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 89 (C):31-40.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references