Philosophical Issues (forthcoming)

Authors
Raff Donelson
Pennsylvania State University
Abstract
Almost twenty years ago, a genuinely new school of thought emerged in the field of jurisprudential methodology. It is a pragmatist school. Roughly, the pragmatists contend that, when inquiring about the nature of law, we should evaluate potential answers based on practical criteria. For many legal philosophers, this contention seems both unclear and unhinged. That appearance is lamentable. The pragmatist approach to jurisprudential methodology has received insufficient attention for at least two reasons. First, the pragmatists do not conceive of themselves as comprising a school; in fact, these proponents have different names for their common position, which makes it hard to see the commonalities. Second, the most famous statement of the pragmatist view has received withering criticism, criticism that has not been sufficiently answered. That fact may lead opponents of pragmatism, as well as potential supporters, to doubt that a viable view of this kind can be held. This Essay aims to serve as a corrective to both problems.
Keywords Pragmatism  Normative positivism  Jurisprudence  Philosophical methodology  Conceptual analysis  Ameliorative analysis  Conceptual engineering  Methodology of jurisprudence  Representationalism
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/phis.12204
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Concept of Law.Hla Hart - 1961 - Oxford University Press.
Law’s Empire.R. Dworkin - 1986 - Harvard University Press.
Conceptual Ethics I.Alexis Burgess & David Plunkett - 2013 - Philosophy Compass 8 (12):1091-1101.
Natural Law and Natural Rights.John Finnis - 1980 - Oxford University Press UK.
The Morality of Law.Lon L. Fuller - 1964 - Yale University Press.

View all 23 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Describing Law.Raff Donelson - 2020 - Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 33 (1):85-106.
Jurisprudence, 2009-2010.David Brooke - 2009 - Routledge-Cavendish.
Making Sense in Jurisprudence.Bernard S. Jackson - 1996 - Liverpool: Deborah Charles Publications.
On the Historical School of Jurisprudence.Robert Rodes Jr - 2003 - American Journal of Jurisprudence 48:165-184.
On the Historical School of Jurisprudence.R. E. Rodes - 2004 - American Journal of Jurisprudence 49 (1):165-184.
How Pragmatist Was Sellars? Reflections on an Analytic Pragmatism.James O'Shea - 2020 - In Stefan Brandt & Anke Breunig (eds.), Wilfrid Sellars and Twentieth-Century Philosophy. New York: Routledge. pp. 110–29.
Jurisprudence.David Brooke - 2011 - Routledge.
Freestanding Pragmatism in Law and Bioethics.John D. Arras - 2001 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 22 (2):69-85.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2021-10-07

Total views
39 ( #277,852 of 2,454,486 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
39 ( #20,505 of 2,454,486 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes