Science and Engineering Ethics 16 (2):221-249 (2010)

Neelke Doorn
Delft University of Technology
Due to their non-hierarchical structure, socio-technical networks are prone to the occurrence of the problem of many hands. In the present paper an approach is introduced in which people’s opinions on responsibility are empirically traced. The approach is based on the Rawlsian concept of Wide Reflective Equilibrium (WRE) in which people’s considered judgments on a case are reflectively weighed against moral principles and background theories, ideally leading to a state of equilibrium. Application of the method to a hypothetical case with an artificially constructed network showed that it is possible to uncover the relevant data to assess a consensus amongst people in terms of their individual WRE. It appeared that the moral background theories people endorse are not predictive for their actual distribution of responsibilities but that they indicate ways of reasoning and justifying outcomes. Two ways of ascribing responsibilities were discerned, corresponding to two requirements of a desirable responsibility distribution: fairness and completeness. Applying the method triggered learning effects, both with regard to conceptual clarification and moral considerations, and in the sense that it led to some convergence of opinions. It is recommended to apply the method to a real engineering case in order to see whether this approach leads to an overlapping consensus on a responsibility distribution which is justifiable to all and in which no responsibilities are left unfulfilled, therewith trying to contribute to the solution of the problem of many hands.
Keywords Responsibility  Problem of many hands  Wide Reflective Equilibrium  Procedural ethics  Engineering ethics  Socio-technical networks
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11948-009-9155-0
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,355
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Ethics Without Principles.Jonathan Dancy - 2004 - Oxford University Press.
Doing & Deserving; Essays in the Theory of Responsibility.Joel Feinberg - 1970 - Princeton: Princeton University Press.

View all 21 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Philosophy of Technology.Maarten Franssen - 2010 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Exploring Responsibility Rationales in Research and Development.Neelke Doorn - 2012 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 37 (3):180-209.

View all 9 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Reflective Equilibrium or Evolving Tradition?Hilliard Aronovitch - 1996 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 39 (3 & 4):399 – 419.
The Moral Responsibility of the Hospital.Richard T. De George - 1982 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 7 (1):87-100.
Ethics, AIDS, and Community Responsibility.John Douard - 1990 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 11 (3).
Responsibility for the Future.Joel Feinberg - 1988 - Philosophy Research Archives 14:93-113.


Added to PP index

Total views
43 ( #265,324 of 2,519,575 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #407,153 of 2,519,575 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes