Journal of Business Ethics 91 (1):127-143 (2010)
Authors |
|
Abstract |
Insights from social science are increasingly used in the field of applied ethics. However, recent insights have shown that the empirical branch of business ethics lacks thorough theoretical grounding. This article discusses the use of the Rawlsian methods of wide reflective equilibrium and overlapping consensus in the field of applied ethics. Instead of focussing on one single comprehensive ethical doctrine to provide adequate guidance for resolving moral dilemmas, these Rawlsian methods seek to find a balance between considered judgments and intuitions concerning particular cases on the one hand and general principles and theories on the other. In business ethics this approach is promissing because it enables decision-making in a pluralist context with different stakeholders who often endorse different or even conflicting cultural and moral frameworks without giving priority to any of them. Moreover, the method is well founded in political theory. A taxonomy of different kinds of applications is developed, and classified according to the purpose, the content, and the type of justification. On the basis of this taxonomy an inventory of 12 recent applications is made. In terms of the purpose and content of the method the applications are rather diverse. Two conceptual obstacles for applying Rawlsian methods are identified, viz. inclusiveness and the communitarian objection that people have to become detached from their personal life. It is found that methodological questions, such as the question how to retrieve the relevant empirical data, are scarcely addressed in the literature. To advance the use of empirical approaches in general, and that of Rawlsian approaches in particular, it is important not only to use empirical data but to use methodological insights from social sciences in order to further advance the field of empirical ethics. It is recommended that stakeholders be given a more active role in the assessment and justification of these methods
|
Keywords | applied ethics conflicting values ethical methodology justification overlapping consensus Rawls wide reflective equilibrium |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
Reprint years | 2009, 2010 |
ISBN(s) | |
DOI | 10.1007/s10551-009-0073-5 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
Wide Reflective Equilibrium and Theory Acceptance in Ethics.Norman Daniels - 1979 - Journal of Philosophy 76 (5):256-282.
View all 53 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
Responsibility Ascriptions in Technology Development and Engineering: Three Perspectives. [REVIEW]Neelke Doorn - 2012 - Science and Engineering Ethics 18 (1):69-90.
Creating ‘Local Publics’: Responsibility and Involvement in Decision-Making on Technologies with Local Impacts.Udo Pesch, Nicole M. A. Huijts, Gunter Bombaerts, Neelke Doorn & Agnieszka Hunka - 2020 - Science and Engineering Ethics 26 (4):2215-2234.
The Dawn of the AI Robots: Towards a New Framework of AI Robot Accountability.Zsófia Tóth, Robert Caruana, Thorsten Gruber & Claudia Loebbecke - forthcoming - Journal of Business Ethics:1-22.
Wide Reflective Equilibrium as a Normative Model for Responsible Governance.Neelke Doorn - 2013 - NanoEthics 7 (1):29-43.
Anticipatory Ethics and Governance : Towards a Future Care Orientation Around Nanotechnology.Syed A. M. Tofail, Finbarr Murphy, Martin Mullins & Karena Hester - 2015 - NanoEthics 9 (2):123-136.
View all 8 citations / Add more citations
Similar books and articles
Ethical Analyses of HRM: A Review and Research Agenda. [REVIEW]Michelle Greenwood - 2013 - Journal of Business Ethics 114 (2):355-366.
Empirical Research on Ethical Issues in Pediatric Research.Joan E. Sieber - 2008 - Ethics and Behavior 18 (2-3):127 – 138.
Ethical Issues [in Social Measurement]: An Overview.Mairi Levitt & Garrath Williams - 2004 - In Kimberly Kempf-Leonard (ed.), Encyclopedia of Social Measurement. Elsevier.
Investigating Ethical Issues in Engineering Design.Ibo Poel - 2001 - Science and Engineering Ethics 7 (3):429-446.
Investigating Ethical Issues in Engineering Design.Ibo van de Poel - 2001 - Science and Engineering Ethics 7 (3):429-446.
Ethical Problems in Research on Risky Behaviors and Risky Populations.Sandra Scarr - 1994 - Ethics and Behavior 4 (2):147 – 155.
How Should We Do Nanoethics? A Network Approach for Discerning Ethical Issues in Nanotechnology.Ibo van de Poel - 2008 - NanoEthics 2 (1):25-38.
Towards an Ethical Research Agenda for International HRM: The Possibilities of a Plural Cosmopolitan Framework. [REVIEW]Maddy Janssens & Chris Steyaert - 2012 - Journal of Business Ethics 111 (1):61-72.
The Conceptualization and Measurement of Philosophical Approaches That Influence Ethical Decision Making in the Work Context: Part 1.E. Boshoff & M. Kotzé - 2011 - African Journal of Business Ethics 5 (1):36.
Ethics and the Social Dimension of Research Activities.Isabella Paoletti - 2014 - Human Studies 37 (2):257-277.
A Proposed Rural Healthcare Ethics Agenda.W. Nelson, A. Pomerantz, K. Howard & A. Bushy - 2007 - Journal of Medical Ethics 33 (3):136-139.
A Special Section on Research in Engineering Ethics Towards a Research Programme for Ethics and Technology.Michiel Brumsen & Ibo van de Poel - 2001 - Science and Engineering Ethics 7 (3):365-378.
Ethical Issues in Applying Quantitative Models for Setting Priorities in Prevention.Dan W. Brock - 2007 - In Angus Dawson & Marcel Verweij (eds.), Ethics, Prevention, and Public Health. Clarendon Press.
The Need for Interdisciplinary Dialogue in Developing Ethical Approaches to Neuroeducational Research.Paul A. Howard-Jones & Kate D. Fenton - 2012 - Neuroethics 5 (2):119-134.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2009-04-27
Total views
39 ( #290,906 of 2,506,078 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,984 of 2,506,078 )
2009-04-27
Total views
39 ( #290,906 of 2,506,078 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,984 of 2,506,078 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads