Ethical Perspectives 15 (3):381-398 (2008)

Neelke Doorn
Delft University of Technology
In the last decades, the notions of forgiveness and reconciliation have been applied more and more in the public sphere. This paper claims that forgiveness in transitional justice practices is often difficult if not impossible to achieve, and that it could generate counterproductive processes. It is unclear what ‘collective forgiveness’ is, if it is a realistic concept at all. The expectation of forgiveness seems to generate much resistance, even when former oppressors take up responsibility or show regret. Often past-sensibilities are too strong, and in many victim-groups self-respect is lacking. Moreover, the role of emotions in public settings remains obscure. These complexities raise the question of whether forgiveness is an appropriate ideal to aim at in transitional justice practices, especially when participants are involved in attempts at reconciliation in more or less coercive ways. To give up the ideal of forgiveness, however, does not imply that reconciliation is unattainable. Alternative accounts of reconciliation are presented which do not start from forgiveness. These alternative accounts show that reconciliation is possible, but it seems important for former victims to regain some sense of self-worth and recognition by others first. Only then people can enter into the long process of rebuilding relationships of trust with former wrongdoers
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.2143/EP.15.3.2033157
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 59,848
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Memory, History, Forgetting.Paul Ricoeur - 2004 - University of Chicago Press.
Forgivingness.Robert C. Roberts - 1995 - American Philosophical Quarterly 32 (4):289 - 306.
Forgiveness and the Intrinsic Value of Persons.Margaret Holmgren - 1993 - American Philosophical Quarterly 30 (4):341 - 352.
The Promise and Pitfalls of Apology.Trudy Govier & Wilhelm Verwoerd - 2002 - Journal of Social Philosophy 33 (1):67–82.
6. The Moral Foundations of Truth Commissions.Dennis Thompson & Amy Gutmann - 2000 - In Dennis Thompson & Amy Gutmann (eds.), Why Deliberative Democracy? Princeton University Press. pp. 160-188.

View all 11 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Transitional Justice and Equality: A Response to Eisikovits.Jamie Terence Kelly - 2010 - Review of International Affairs 61 (1138-1139):190-196.
The Nature and Limits of Forgiveness.Alice MacLachlan - 2008 - Dissertation, Boston University
A Theory of National Reconciliation: Some Insights From Africa.Thaddeus Metz - 2015 - In Claudio Corradetti, Nir Eisikovits & Jack Rotondi (eds.), Theorizing Transitional Justice. Ashgate. pp. 119-35.
The Dilemma of Divine Forgiveness.Glen Pettigrove - 2008 - Religious Studies 44 (4):457-464.
Forgiveness in Context.Molly Andrews - 2000 - Journal of Moral Education 29 (1):75-86.


Added to PP index

Total views
31 ( #342,012 of 2,432,815 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #464,144 of 2,432,815 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes