A defense of Isaacson’s thesis, or how to make sense of the boundaries of finite mathematics

Synthese 203 (2):1-22 (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Daniel Isaacson has advanced an epistemic notion of arithmetical truth according to which the latter is the set of truths that we grasp on the basis of our understanding of the structure of natural numbers alone. Isaacson’s thesis is then the claim that Peano Arithmetic (PA) is the theory of finite mathematics, in the sense that it proves all and only arithmetical truths thus understood. In this paper, we raise a challenge for the thesis and show how it can be overcome. We introduce the concept of purity for theories of arithmetic: a theory of arithmetic is pure when it only proves arithmetical truths. Then, we argue that, under Isaacson’s thesis, some PA-provable truths—including transfinite induction claims for infinite ordinals and some consistency statements—are seemingly not arithmetical in Isaacson’s sense, and hence that Isaacson’s thesis might entail the impurity of PA. Nonetheless, we conjecture that the advocate of Isaacson’s thesis can avoid this undesirable consequence: the arithmetical nature, as understood by Isaacson, of all contentious PA-provable statements can be justified. As a case study, we explore how this is done for transfinite induction claims with infinite ordinals below ε0. To this end, we show that the PA-proof of such claims employs exclusively resources from finite mathematics, and that ordinals below ε0 are finitary objects despite being infinite.

Similar books and articles

Primitive Recursion and Isaacson’s Thesis.Oliver Tatton-Brown - 2019 - Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 8 (1):4-15.
Mathematical intuition and objectivity.Daniel Isaacson - 1994 - In Alexander George (ed.), Mathematics and Mind. Oxford University Press. pp. 118--140.
The Reality of Mathematics and the Case of Set Theory.Daniel Isaacson - 2010 - In Zsolt Novák & András Simonyi (eds.), Truth, reference, and realism. New York: Central European University Press. pp. 1-76.
Does God Have a Sense of Humor?Rik Peels - 2015 - Faith and Philosophy 32 (3):271-292.
Finite mathematics.Shaughan Lavine - 1995 - Synthese 103 (3):389 - 420.
Non-Aristotelian Political Animals.Ben Bryan - 2015 - History of Philosophy Quarterly 32 (4):293-311.
Film as Philosophy: In Defense of a Bold Thesis.Aaron Smuts - 2009 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 67 (3):409-420.
Defending the Hobbesian Right of Self-Defense.Susanne Sreedhar - 2008 - Political Theory 36 (6):781-802.
Self-Defense, Forfeiture and Necessity.David Alm - 2019 - Philosophical Papers 48 (3):335-358.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-02-03

Downloads
45 (#339,015)

6 months
45 (#86,360)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Pablo Dopico
King's College London

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Axiomatic theories of truth.Volker Halbach - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Computability and Logic.George S. Boolos, John P. Burgess & Richard C. Jeffrey - 2003 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 9 (4):520-521.
Self-reference in arithmetic I.Volker Halbach & Albert Visser - 2014 - Review of Symbolic Logic 7 (4):671-691.
An Introduction to Proof Theory: Normalization, Cut-Elimination, and Consistency Proofs.Paolo Mancosu, Sergio Galvan & Richard Zach - 2021 - Oxford: Oxford University Press. Edited by Sergio Galvan & Richard Zach.
Mathematical Logic.Georg Kreisel - 1965 - In Lectures on Modern Mathematics. New York: Wiley. pp. 95-195.

View all 19 references / Add more references