In D. Dieks, S. Hartmann, T. Uebel & M. Weber (eds.), Probabilities, Laws and Structure. Springer (2012)

Abstract
An influential position in the philosophy of biology claims that there are no biological laws, since any apparently biological generalization is either too accidental, fact-like or contingent to be named a law, or is simply reducible to physical laws that regulate electrical and chemical interactions taking place between merely physical systems. In the following I will stress a neglected aspect of the debate that emerges directly from the growing importance of mathematical models of biological phenomena. My main aim is to defend, as well as reinforce, the view that there are indeed laws also in biology, and that their difference in stability, contingency or resilience with respect to physical laws is one of degrees, and not of kind
Keywords Philosophy of biology  laws
Categories (categorize this paper)
Buy the book Find it on Amazon.com
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Studies in the Logic of Explanation.Carl G. Hempel & Paul Oppenheim - 1948 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 14 (2):133-133.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Explanation and Explanationism in Science and Metaphysics.Juha Saatsi - forthcoming - In Matthew Slater & Zanja Yudell (eds.), Metaphysics and the Philosophy of Science: New Essays. Oxford University Press.
Are Natural Selection Explanatory Models a Priori?José Díez & Pablo Lorenzano - 2015 - Biology and Philosophy 30 (6):787-809.
Formalizing Darwinism, Naturalizing Mathematics.Fabio Sterpetti - 2015 - Paradigmi. Rivista di Critica Filosofica 33 (2):133-160.

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

There May Be Strict Empirical Laws in Biology, After All.Mehmet Elgin - 2006 - Biology and Philosophy 21 (1):119-134.
Biology and a Priori Laws.Mehmet Elgin - 2003 - Philosophy of Science 70 (5):1380--1389.
Gould on Laws in Biological Science.Lee Mcintyre - 1997 - Biology and Philosophy 12 (3):357-367.
Sober and Elgin on Laws of Biology: A Critique. [REVIEW]Lane DesAutels - 2010 - Biology and Philosophy 25 (2):249-256.
How is Biological Explanation Possible?Alexander Rosenberg - 2001 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 52 (4):735-760.
Historical Laws in Modern Biology.Not By Me - 1983 - Acta Biotheoretica 32 (3).
Theoretical Modeling and Biological Laws.Gregory Cooper - 1996 - Philosophy of Science 63 (3):35.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2012-03-20

Total views
954 ( #6,753 of 2,505,180 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
81 ( #9,603 of 2,505,180 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes