Being Rational and Being Wrong


Do people tend to be overconfident in their opinions? Many think so. They’ve run studies to test whether people are calibrated: whether their confidence in their opinions matches the proportion of those opinions that are true. Under certain conditions, people are systematically “over-calibrated”—for example, of the opinions they’re 80% confident in, only 60% are true. From this observed over-calibration, it’s inferred that people are irrationally overconfident. My question: When—and why—is this inference warranted? Answering this question requires articulating a general connection between being rational and being right—something extant studies have not done. I show how to do so using the notion of deference. This provides a theoretical foundation to calibration research, but also reveals a flaw: the connection between being rational and being right is much weaker than is commonly assumed; as a result, rational people can often be expected to be miscalibrated. Thus we can’t test whether people are overconfident by simply testing whether they are over-calibrated; instead, we must first predict the expected rational deviations from calibration, and then compare those predictions to people’s performance. I show how in principle this can be done—and that doing so has the potential to overturn the standard interpretation of robust empirical effects. In short: rational people can be expected to be wrong more often than you might think.



External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Beliefs about overconfidence.Sandra Ludwig & Julia Nafziger - 2011 - Theory and Decision 70 (4):475-500.
Economists as experts: Overconfidence in theory and practice.Erik Angner - 2006 - Journal of Economic Methodology 13 (1):1-24.
Epistemic harm and virtues of self-evaluation.Sarah Wright - 2018 - Synthese 198 (Suppl 7):1691-1709.
How to insure against utilitarian overconfidence.Nicholas Agar - 2014 - Monash Bioethics Review 32 (3-4):162-171.


Added to PP

1,170 (#5,785)

6 months
165 (#3,800)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Kevin Dorst
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Thinking, Fast and Slow.Daniel Kahneman - 2011 - New York: New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Accuracy and the Laws of Credence.Richard Pettigrew - 2016 - New York, NY.: Oxford University Press UK.

View all 95 references / Add more references