Peirce’s “method of tenacity” and the “method of science”: the consistency of pragmatism and naturalism

Mauro Dorato
Università degli Studi Roma Tre
In 1877 Peirce distinguished four different methods of “fixating our beliefs”, among which I here concentrate on what could be called the “method of tenacity” and the “method of science”. I then use these distinctions to argue that despite their apparent conflict, pragmatism, relying on the method of tenacity, and naturalism, relying on the method of science, can and should coexist, both in science and in metaphysics.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 37,134
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total downloads
71 ( #94,597 of 2,308,309 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #447,932 of 2,308,309 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature