"In Abundance of Counsellors there Is Victory": Reasoning about Public Policy from a Religious Worldview

In Peter Jonkers & Oliver J. Wiertz (eds.), Religious Truth and Identity in an Age of Plurality. Routledge. pp. 162-181 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Some religious communities argue that public policy is best decided by their own members, on the grounds that collaborating with those reasoning from secular or “worldly” perspectives will only foment error about how society should be run. But I argue that epistemology instead recommends fostering disagreement among a plurality of religious and secular worldviews. Inter-worldview disagreement over public policy can challenge our unquestioned assumptions, deliver evidence we would likely have missed, and expose us to new epistemic alternatives; when done respectfully, it can also combat epistemically problematic biases and groupthink. I address two objections that members of a politically active religious community might raise: one that inter-worldview disagreement about public policy is not needed because one’s own beliefs are already true, and another that it is not needed because one’s own beliefforming processes are divinely guided.



External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Narrowed Domain of Disagreement for Well-Being Policy.Gil Hersch - 2018 - Public Affairs Quarterly 32 (1):1-19.
Politics, policy and faith: The Christian right in Australia.Marcus Smith & Peter Marden - 2012 - The Politics and Religion Journal 6 (2):303-332.
Science and Religion in the Public Square.Peter Dodson - 2010 - In Melville Y. Stewart (ed.), Science and Religion in Dialogue. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 251--264.
On Highest Authority.Zachary Hoskins - 2009 - Social Theory and Practice 35 (3):393-412.
Religious Disagreement Is Not Unique.Margaret Greta Turnbull - 2021 - In Matthew A. Benton & Jonathan L. Kvanvig (eds.), Religious Disagreement and Pluralism. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 90-106.
Resolving Religious Disagreements.Katherine Dormandy - 2018 - Faith and Philosophy 35 (1):56-83.
Habermas and theology.Nicholas Adams - 2006 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
The role of religion in the debate about physician-assisted dying.William E. Stempsey - 2010 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 13 (4):383-387.


Added to PP

228 (#88,657)

6 months
90 (#51,309)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Katherine Dormandy
University of Innsbruck

Citations of this work

Epistemic phariseeism.Dormandy Katherine - 2023 - Religious Studies 59 (3):515-532.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references