Religious Studies 21 (1):91 - 92 (1985)

In my paper, ‘Agnosticism’, I asked the reader to consider the following three propositions. There is more evidence for theism than for atheism. There is more evidence for atheism than for theism. There is roughly the same amount of evidence for both. And I claimed that if it is not known which of to is true, then theism, atheism and agnosticism are all equally rational positions. As against that claim, Professor Brinton cites the following epistemic principle: When the state of the evidence on some question ‘p?’ is uncertain, suspension of belief is the most appropriate doxastic attitude . However, my paper contained the seeds of a refutation of this principle. I wrote there that the agnostic
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S0034412500016917
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,703
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Reply to Professor Baker.Clement Dore - 1984 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 16 (3):251 - 255.
Reply to Brinton.Alan Millar - 1992 - Philosophical Quarterly 42 (169):486-491.
Reply to Professor Brender and Professor Byrne.Phillip Cole - 2002 - Social Philosophy Today 18:197-206.
I. Mathematical Modeling of Election Predictions: Final Reply to Professor Aubert.Herbert A. Simon - 1983 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 26 (2):231 – 232.
Social Contracts and Corporations: A Reply to Hodapp. [REVIEW]Thomas Donaldson - 1990 - Journal of Business Ethics 9 (2):133 - 137.
A Reply to Professor Rowe.Clement Dore - 1986 - Faith and Philosophy 3 (3):314-318.
Alter et etiam: Rejoinder to Schepers.Marcelo Dascal - 2004 - The Leibniz Review 14:137-151.
Reply to Professor Fetzer.D. H. Mellor - 1978 - Philosophia 7 (3-4):661-666.
Reply to Professor Körner.J. W. N. Watkins - 1960 - Mind 69 (275):406-407.
Reply to Professor Marcus.W. V. Quine - 1961 - Synthese 13 (4):323 - 330.


Added to PP index

Total views
16 ( #651,446 of 2,462,500 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
15 ( #50,502 of 2,462,500 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes