In V. Petkov (ed.), Space, Time, and Spacetime. Springer. pp. 193-207 (2010)
In this paper we argue that structural explanations are an effective way of explaining well known relativistic phenomena like length contraction and time dilation, and then try to understand how this can be possible by looking at the literature on scientific models. In particular, we ask whether and how a model like that provided by Minkowski spacetime can be said to represent the physical world, in such a way that it can successfully explain physical phenomena structurally. We conclude by claiming that a partial isomorphic approach to scientific representation can supply an answer only if supplemented by a robust injection of pragmatic factors.
|Keywords||Spacetime Structural Explanation Models|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Similar books and articles
Relativistic Quantum Becoming.Wayne C. Myrvold - 2003 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 54 (3):475-500.
Is Structural Spacetime Realism Relationism in Disguise? The Supererogatory Nature of the Substantivalism/Relationism Debate.Mauro Dorato - unknown
There's No Time Like the Present (in Minkowski Spacetime).Steven F. Savitt - 2000 - Philosophy of Science 67 (3):574.
Space, Time, and Spacetime: Physical and Philosophical Implications of Minkowski's Unification of Space and Time.Vesselin Petkov (ed.) - 2010 - Springer.
Scientific Explanation and Scientific Structuralism.Mauro Dorato & Laura Felline - 2011 - In Alisa Bokulich & Peter Bokulich (eds.), Scientific Structuralism, Boston Studies in the Philosophy of science. Springer. pp. 161--176.
Added to index2010-03-19
Total downloads99 ( #48,624 of 2,146,888 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #184,910 of 2,146,888 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.