Think 13 (37):85-94 (2014)

Abstract
I point out that, though animal bodies and their parts are not sufficiently similar to the products of conscious design to warrant an inference to a supernatural designer of the former things, the proponent of the design argument would be on firmer ground were he to base his inference on the more specific resemblance of well-functioning human eyes and brains to well-functioning cameras and computers. Though I argue that Darwin has not refuted the design argument, I conclude that the design arguer needs to show that there is a first cause in the enormously lengthy causal sequences which have culminated in human eyes and brains
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/s1477175613000511
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 53,634
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Paley’s Argument for Design.Graham Oppy - 2002 - Philo 5 (2):161-173.
Hume and the Argument for Biological Design.Graham Oppy - 1996 - Biology and Philosophy 11 (4):519-534.
Design and its Discontents.Bruce H. Weber - 2011 - Synthese 178 (2):271 - 289.
What is Wrong with Intelligent Design?Gregory W. Dawes - 2007 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 61 (2):69 - 81.
Anthropocentrism and the Design Argument.Neil A. Manson - 2000 - Religious Studies 36 (2):163-176.
Can Science Detect Design in Nature? Van der Burgt & J. M. Peter - 2008 - Yearbook of the Irish Philosophical Society 2008:110 - 131.
The “Who Designed the Designer?” Objection to Design Arguments.Lloyd Strickland - 2014 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 75 (2):87-100.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2014-03-17

Total views
48 ( #199,545 of 2,348,924 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #512,628 of 2,348,924 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes