The Human Right to Private Property

Theoretical Inquiries in Law 18 (2):391-416 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

For private property to be legitimately recognized as a universal human right, its meaning should pass the test of self-imposability by an end. In this Essay, we argue, negatively, that the prevailing understanding of private property cannot plausibly meet this demanding standard; and develop, affirmatively, a liberal conception which has a much better prospect of meeting property’s justificatory challenge. Private property, on our account, is an empowering device, which is crucial both to people’s personal autonomy and to their relational equality. The liberal conception of the human right to property has both vertical and horizontal significance — it implies respect from both the public authority and other individuals — which means that it is thoroughly political but not necessarily statist. Our account generates important implications, both domestic and transnational. Domestically, it implies that whereas some property rights should be subject to strong constitutional protection, state law should facilitate other types of private and non-private property institutions, and these property institutions may well be subject to non-owners’ claims to access and, more broadly, to being treated respectfully. Furthermore, our conception of the human right to property requires that everyone have the unusual authority typical of full-blown private ownership. Transnationally, our analysis highlights a freestanding dimension of relational justice, which is relevant across borders even given that our distributive obligations are statist. This injunction of relational justice in transnational interactions brings into question the adequacy of the current state of the law, according to which these interactions are mainly governed by choice-of-law rules that conceptualize them as wholly subsumed under the capacities of the parties as citizens of their respective polities.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,593

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Social Purpose of Private Property.Solveiga Cirtautienė & Dalia Vasarienė - 2009 - Jurisprudencija: Mokslo darbu žurnalas 118 (4):105-122.
On the Value of the Intellectual Commons.James Wilson - 2012 - In New Frontiers in the Philosophy of Intellectual Property.
Hegel on Private Property: A Contextual Reading.Samuel Duncan - 2017 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 55 (3):263-284.
Preserving Common Rights Within Private Property.Murray Hofmans-Sheard - 2005 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 12 (2):3-9.
The Right to Private Property.Jeremy Waldron - 1990 - Oxford, GB: Clarendon Press.
Original-Acquisition Justifications of Private Property.A. John Simmons - 1994 - Social Philosophy and Policy 11 (2):63-84.
The Evolution of Private and Open Access Property.Gideon Parchomovsky & Abraham Bell - 2009 - Theoretical Inquiries in Law 10 (1):77-102.
Property and Practical Reason.Adam J. MacLeod - 2015 - Cambridge University Press.
Reflections on Private Property as Ego and War.Paul Babie - 2017 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 30 (4):563-591.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-12-14

Downloads
22 (#606,933)

6 months
3 (#445,838)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Promises, Rights, and Deontic Control.Crescente Molina - 2020 - Law and Philosophy 39 (4):409-426.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references