Ethics 74 (2):150-154 (1964)
Marcus singer's deduction of the generalization argument in "generalization in ethics" is not sound. The argument itself is invalid, But there is a valid moral principle which is very similar to the one singer thinks he has proved. This valid principle is that if the consequences of not having a rule against x would be undesirable, Then there should be a rule against x. But this is not the same as to say that if the consequences of everyone's doing x are undesirable, Then each person is obligated not to do x. (staff)
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
The Supervenience Argument and the Generalization Problem.Jürgen Schröder - 2002 - Erkenntnis 56 (3):319 - 328.
Anselm, Gaunilo, and Lost Island.Keith Burgess-Jackson - 1994 - Philosophy and Theology 8 (3):243-249.
Relativism and Reflexivity.Robert Lockie - 2003 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 11 (3):319 – 339.
``Middle Knowledge: A Refutation Revisited&Quot.William Hasker - 1995 - Faith and Philosophy 12 (2):223-236.
'Everyone', Consequences, and Generalization Arguments.J. Howard Sobel - 1967 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 10 (1-4):373-404.
The Role of Kant's Refutation of Idealism.Ralf M. Bader - 2012 - Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 94 (1):53-73.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads6 ( #560,090 of 2,171,698 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #326,424 of 2,171,698 )
How can I increase my downloads?