Cybernetics Is the Answer, but What Was the Conversation About?

Constructivist Foundations 11 (3):587-589 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Open peer commentary on the article “Design Research as a Variety of Second-Order Cybernetic Practice” by Ben Sweeting. Upshot: It is suggested that the main arguments of the target article could be constructed in an easier way and would become even more compelling if a radical consideration of the systemic nature of design were taken into account.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

What Can Cybernetics Learn from Design?C. M. Herr - 2016 - Constructivist Foundations 11 (3):583-585.
Digital Design Research and Second-Order Cybernetics.M. de Sousa van Stralen - 2016 - Constructivist Foundations 11 (3):586-587.
A Theatre for Exploring the Cybernetic.B. Sweeting - 2016 - Constructivist Foundations 11 (3):619-620.
Can Conversations be Designed?C. M. Herr - 2015 - Constructivist Foundations 11 (1):74-75.
Design Cycles: Conversing with Lawrence Halprin.T. Scholte - 2016 - Constructivist Foundations 11 (3):579-581.
Design Research as a Variety of Second-Order Cybernetic Practice.Ben Sweeting - 2016 - Constructivist Foundations 11 (3):572-579.
Avoiding Violence by Design.A. O. Brightman - 2015 - Constructivist Foundations 11 (1):82-84.
Beware False Dichotomies.P. A. Cariani - 2016 - Constructivist Foundations 11 (3):472-475.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-07-15

Downloads
22 (#690,757)

6 months
1 (#1,510,037)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references