Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 14 (4):pp. 331-339 (2007)
George Engel’s biopsychosocial model was associated with the critique of biomedical dogmatism and acknowledged the historical precedence of the work of Adolf Meyer. However, the importance of Meyer’s psychobiology is not always recognized. One of the reasons may be because of his tendency to compromise with biomedical attitudes. This paper restates the Meyerian perspective, explicitly acknowledging the split between biomedical and biopsychological approaches in the origin of modern psychiatry. Our present-day understanding of this conflict is confounded by reactions to ‘anti-psychiatry.’ Neo-Meyerian principles can only be reestablished by a challenge to biomedicine that accepts, as did Meyer, the inherent uncertainty of medicine and psychiatry.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Probleme der Psychosphäre.Adolf Meyer-Abich - 1963 - Zeitschrift für Philosophische Forschung 17 (3):503 - 522.
The Principle of Complementarity in Biology.Adolf Meyer-Abich - 1955 - Acta Biotheoretica 11 (2):57-74.
Biomedical and Bioethical Issues in Parliamentary TA and in Health Technology Assessment.Leonhard Hennen - 2004 - Poiesis and Praxis 2 (s 2-3):207-220.
Adolf Meyer: Psychiatric Anarchist.S. Nassir Ghaemi - 2007 - Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 14 (4):pp. 341-345.
Eclecticism and Adolf Meyer's Functional Understanding of Mental Illness.D. B. Double - 2007 - Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 14 (4):pp. 356-358.
Adolph Meyer's Psychobiology in Historical Context, and its Relationship to George Engel's Biopsychosocial Model.I. V. Wallace - 2007 - Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 14 (4):pp. 347-353.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads32 ( #162,280 of 2,177,988 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #317,698 of 2,177,988 )
How can I increase my downloads?