Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 12 (1):151-168 (2012)

Authors
Lachlan Doughney
University of Melbourne
Abstract
The article discusses how and why philosopher Ayn Rand attempted to deduce an ought conclusion from only is premises. It contends that Rand did attempt to deduce what one ought and ought not do from what is or is not the case. It argues that Rand attempted to provide a universally objective unshakable normative moral claim, that people ought to act in accordance with her value and virtue system.
Keywords Ayn Rand  is ought problem  Deduction
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 51,591
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-01-29

Total views
114 ( #79,231 of 2,331,163 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
8 ( #82,197 of 2,331,163 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes