Developing structured representations

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31 (4):384-385 (2008)

Abstract
Leech et al.'s model proposes representing relations as primed transformations rather than as structured representations (explicit representations of relations and their roles dynamically bound to fillers). However, this renders the model unable to explain several developmental trends (including relational integration and all changes not attributable to growth in relational knowledge). We suggest looking to an alternative computational model that learns structured representations from examples
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S0140525X08004536
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 44,293
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Literal Meaning.François Recanati - 2002 - Cambridge University Press.
Literal Meaning.François Recanati - 2007 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 75 (2):487-492.
A Dynamic Systems Approach to the Development of Cognition and Action.David Morris, E. Thelen & L. B. Smith - 1997 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 11 (2).

View all 73 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
10 ( #736,109 of 2,270,971 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #832,952 of 2,270,971 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature