Integrative social contracts theory: Hype over hypernorms [Book Review]

Journal of Business Ethics 26 (2):101 - 110 (2000)

Applying social contract theory to business ethics is a relatively new idea, and perhaps nobody has pursued this direction better than Thomas Donaldson and Thomas W. Dunfee. Their "Integrative Social Contracts Theory" manages to combine culturally sensitive decision making capacities with trans-cultural norms by setting up a layered system of social contracts. Lurking behind their work is a concern with the problems of relativism. They hope to alleviate these problems by introducing three concepts important to the ISCT: "authentic norms," which clarify culturally specific norms, "priority rules," which determine the rules of engagement when authentic norms clash, and "hypernorms," which measure the value of authentic norms against a thin set of universally upheld values. This paper traces the genealogy of these hypernorms and challenges their value for the ISCT. It argues that well-conceived priority rules can do everything hypernorms can, and can do so more simply.
Keywords Donaldson and Dunfee  hypernorms  "Integrative Social Contracts Theory"  priority rules  relativism  Taylor  Walzer
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2004
DOI 10.1023/A:1006154819742
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 41,668
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 15 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
150 ( #47,869 of 2,250,075 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
14 ( #64,480 of 2,250,075 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes

Sign in to use this feature