Managing intentions: The end-of-life administration of analgesics and sedatives, and the possibility of slow euthanasia

Bioethics 22 (7):388-396 (2008)
Rachel Allyson Ankeny
University of Adelaide
There has been much debate regarding the 'double-effect' of sedatives and analgesics administered at the end-of-life, and the possibility that health professionals using these drugs are performing 'slow euthanasia.' On the one hand analgesics and sedatives can do much to relieve suffering in the terminally ill. On the other hand, they can hasten death. According to a standard view, the administration of analgesics and sedatives amounts to euthanasia when the drugs are given with an intention to hasten death. In this paper we report a small qualitative study based on interviews with 8 Australian general physicians regarding their understanding of intention in the context of questions about voluntary euthanasia, assisted suicide and particularly the use of analgesic and sedative infusions (including the possibility of voluntary or non-voluntary 'slow euthanasia'). We found a striking ambiguity and uncertainty regarding intentions amongst doctors interviewed. Some were explicit in describing a 'grey' area between palliation and euthanasia, or a continuum between the two. Not one of the respondents was consistent in distinguishing between a foreseen death and an intended death. A major theme was that 'slow euthanasia' may be more psychologically acceptable to doctors than active voluntary euthanasia by bolus injection, partly because the former would usually only result in a small loss of 'time' for patients already very close to death, but also because of the desirable ambiguities surrounding causation and intention when an infusion of analgesics and sedatives is used. The empirical and philosophical implications of these findings are discussed.
Keywords double effect  hypnotics and sedatives  terminal care  euthanasia  qualitative research  end‐of‐life  intention
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2008.00661.x
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Disambiguating Clinical Intentions: The Ethics of Palliative Sedation.L. A. Jansen - 2010 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 35 (1):19-31.
The Lacking of Moral Equivalency for Continuous Sedation and PAS.Samuel H. LiPuma - 2011 - American Journal of Bioethics 11 (6):48 - 49.

View all 9 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total downloads
314 ( #13,393 of 2,287,569 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
28 ( #14,544 of 2,287,569 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature