Resisting Sparrow's Sexy Reductio : Selection Principles and the Social Good

American Journal of Bioethics 10 (7):16-18 (2010)

Authors
Simon Rippon
Central European University
Thomas Douglas
Oxford University
Katrien Devolder
Oxford University
1 more
Abstract
Principles of procreative beneficence (PPBs) hold that parents have good reasons to select the child with the best life prospects. Sparrow (2010) claims that PPBs imply that we should select only female children, unlesswe attach normative significance to “normal” human capacities. We argue that this claim fails on both empirical and logical grounds. Empirically, Sparrow’s argument for greater female wellbeing rests on a selective reading of the evidence and the incorrect assumption that an advantage for females would persist even when a serious gender imbalance is obtained. Logically, PPBs cite only pro tanto reasons and allow that the good of an individual child could be outweighed by other morally relevant considerations, such as those which take collectively suboptimal outcomes into account. There is thus no need to attach value to the “normal.”
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/15265161.2010.482642
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Morality of Freedom.Joseph Raz - 1986 - Oxford University Press.
The Morality of Freedom.Joseph Raz - 1986 - Philosophy 63 (243):119-122.
The morality of freedom.J. Raz - 1988 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 178 (1):108-109.
The Morality of Freedom.Ernest Marshall - 1994 - Noûs 28 (1):96-98.

View all 6 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Why Bioethicists Still Need to Think More About Sex ….Robert Sparrow - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics 10 (7):W1-W3.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Reductio Ad Absurdum.Nicholas Rescher - 2002 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Resisting Ethics.Scott Schaffer - 2004 - Palgrave-Macmillan.
Fairness in the Selection of Employees.Richard D. Arvey & Gary L. Renz - 1992 - Journal of Business Ethics 11 (5-6):331-340.
Social Equality, Recognition, and Preconditions of Good Life.Arto Laitinen - 2003 - In Michael Fine, Paul Henman & Nicholas Smith (eds.), Social Inequality Today.
An Introduction to Moral and Social Philosophy.Jeffrie G. Murphy - 1973 - Belmont, Calif., Wadsworth Pub. Co..
Probabilistic Causation and the Explanatory Role of Natural Selection.Pablo Razeto-Barry & Ramiro Frick - 2011 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 42 (3):344-355.
The Natures of Selection.Tim Lewens - 2010 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 61 (2):313-333.
The Centrality of the Good: Reflections on Politics and Being.Scott John Hammond - 2010 - Lexington Books, a Division of Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
What Events Are.Jonathan Bennett - 2002 - In Richard M. Gale (ed.), The Blackwell Guide to Metaphysics. Blackwell. pp. 43.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-07-12

Total views
420 ( #13,594 of 2,290,372 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
24 ( #34,842 of 2,290,372 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature