Three Rationales for a Legal Right to Mental Integrity

In S. Ligthart, D. van Toor, T. Kooijmans, T. Douglas & G. Meynen (eds.), Neurolaw: Advances in Neuroscience, Justice and Security. Palgrave Macmillan (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Many states recognize a legal right to bodily integrity, understood as a right against significant, nonconsensual interference with one’s body. Recently, some have called for the recognition of an analogous legal right to mental integrity: a right against significant, nonconsensual interference with one’s mind. In this chapter, we describe and distinguish three different rationales for recognizing such a right. The first appeals to case-based intuitions to establish a distinctive duty not to interfere with others’ minds; the second holds that, if we accept a legal right to bodily integrity, then we must, on pain of philosophical inconsistency, accept a case for an analogous right over the mind; and the third holds that recent technological developments create a need for a legal right to mental integrity.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 89,685

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

From Bodily Rights to Personal Rights.Thomas Douglas - 2020 - In Andreas von Arnauld, Kerstin von der Decken & Mart Susi (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of New Human Rights. Cambridge: pp. 378-384.
The Right to Bodily Integrity.Adrian M. Viens (ed.) - 2014 - Lund Humphries Publishers.
Integrity management: a guide to managing legal and ethical issues in the workplace.Debbie Thorne LeClair - 1998 - Tampa, Fla.: University of Tampa Press. Edited by O. C. Ferrell & John P. Fraedrich.
Dworkin on the value of integrity.Jonathan Crowe - 2007 - Deakin Law Review 12:167.
Bodily integrity and male and female circumcision.Wim Dekkers, Cor Hoffer & Jean-Pierre Wils - 2005 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 8 (2):179-191.
How to Distinguish Autonomy from Integrity.Carolyn McLeod - 2005 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 35 (1):107 - 134.
The Circumstances of Integrity.Jeremy Waldron - 1997 - Legal Theory 3 (1):1-22.
Bodily integrity and the sale of human organs.S. Wilkinson & E. Garrard - 1996 - Journal of Medical Ethics 22 (6):334-339.
Pluralism and Integrity.Pavlos Eleftheriadis - 2010 - Ratio Juris 23 (3):365-389.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-05-25

Downloads
50 (#278,999)

6 months
16 (#107,654)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Lisa Forsberg
University of Oxford
Thomas Douglas
University of Oxford

References found in this work

Free Will, Agency, and Meaning in Life.Derk Pereboom - 2014 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Living Without Free Will.Derk Pereboom - 2001 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Justice for hedgehogs.Ronald Dworkin - 2011 - Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
A Darwinian dilemma for realist theories of value.Sharon Street - 2006 - Philosophical Studies 127 (1):109-166.

View all 118 references / Add more references