Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (3):485-502 (2011)

Authors
David M. Douglas
University of Queensland (PhD)
Abstract
Software ownership allows the owner to restrict the distribution of software and to prevent others from reading the software’s source code and building upon it. However, free software is released to users under software licenses that give them the right to read the source code, modify it, reuse it, and distribute the software to others. Proponents of free software such as Richard M. Stallman and Eben Moglen argue that the social disutility of software ownership is a sufficient justification for prohibiting it. This social disutility includes the social instability of disregarding laws and agreements covering software use and distribution, inequality of software access, and the inability to help others by sharing software with them. Here I consider these and other social disutility claims against withholding specific software rights from users, in particular, the rights to read the source code, duplicate, distribute, modify, imitate, and reuse portions of the software within new programs. I find that generally while withholding these rights from software users does cause some degree of social disutility, only the rights to duplicate, modify and imitate cannot legitimately be denied to users on this basis. The social disutility of withholding the rights to distribute the software, read its source code and reuse portions of it in new programs is insufficient to prohibit software owners from denying them to users. A compromise between the software owner and user can minimise the social disutility of withholding these particular rights from users. However, the social disutility caused by software patents is sufficient for rejecting such patents as they restrict the methods of reducing social disutility possible with other forms of software ownership
Keywords Software   Consequentialism   Rights   Intellectual property   Social disutility   Free software
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11948-010-9224-4
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 59,677
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Cathedral and the Bazaar.Eric Raymond - 1999 - Knowledge, Technology & Policy 12 (3):23-49.
Common Morality and Computing.Bernard Gert - 1999 - Ethics and Information Technology 1 (1):53-60.

View all 6 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Software Piracy in Research: A Moral Analysis.Gary Santillanes & Ryan Marshall Felder - 2015 - Science and Engineering Ethics 21 (4):967-977.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-07-19

Total views
53 ( #194,076 of 2,432,200 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #296,157 of 2,432,200 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes