Criticism as Conversation

Philosophical Perspectives 33 (1):26-61 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

2020

DOI

10.1111/phpe.12125

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 107,455

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Diversity-in-Unity: Art Criticism in Conversation.Joseph Kassman-Tod - 2024 - British Journal of Aesthetics 64 (4):521-542.
Criticism and conversational texts: Rhetorical bases of role, audience, and style in the Buber-Rogers dialogue. [REVIEW]Rob Anderson & Kenneth N. Cissna - 1996 - Human Studies 19 (1):85 - 118.
Daniela K. O'Neill University of Waterloo.Cristina M. Atance - 2001 - In Chris Moore & Karen Lemmon, The Self in Time: Developmental Perspectives. Erlbaum. pp. 121.
Conversation and Conservation. Two Kinds of Anti-Dogmatic Criticism in the Philosophy of Politics and their Antecedents in Ancient Greek Forms of Skepticism and Fallibilism.Dariusz Kubok - 2017 - In Thinking Critically: What Does It Mean?: The Tradition of Philosophical Criticism and its Forms in the European History of Ideas. De Gruyter. pp. 73-92.
Review of Victoria Kahn, Neil saccamano, Daniela coli (eds.), Politics and the Passions, 1500-1850. [REVIEW]Catherine Wilson - 2006 - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2006 (11).
Comments on 'A Conversation About Fuzzy Logic and Vagueness' by Christian G. Fermüller and Petr Hájek.Nicholas J. J. Smith - 2011 - In Petr Cintula, Christian G. Fermüller, Lluis Godo & Petr Hájek, Understanding Vagueness: Logical, Philosophical, and Linguistic Perspectives. College Publications. pp. 417-21.
Philosophical Perspectives on Metaphor.Josef Stern - 1982 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 41 (2):231-234.
Philosophical Perspectives on Music.James O. Young - 1999 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 57 (1):75-76.
Epigenetics and Responsibility: Ethical Perspectives By Moorman, Emma; Smajdor, Anna; Cutas, Daniela, Bristol: Bristol University Press. 2024. pp. 145. $159.95 (Hardback). ISBN: 978‐1‐5292‐2542‐6. [REVIEW]Sonya Anvar & Charles Dupras - 2025 - Bioethics 39 (4):397-398.
Jane Austen's Emma: Philosophical Perspectives.Ira Newman - forthcoming - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-05-29

Downloads
257 (#112,673)

6 months
25 (#142,210)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Daniela Dover
University of California, Los Angeles

Citations of this work

Explaining Loss of Standing to Blame.Justin Snedegar - 2023 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 21 (3-4):404-432.
Aesthetic Blame.Robbie Kubala - 2024 - Journal of the American Philosophical Association 10 (4).
Political persuasion is prima facie disrespectful.Colin Marshall - forthcoming - Journal of Moral Philosophy.
Why immanent critique?Sanford Diehl - 2021 - European Journal of Philosophy 30 (2):676-692.

View all 9 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Moral dimensions: permissibility, meaning, blame.Thomas Scanlon - 2008 - Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Two kinds of respect.Stephen Darwall - 1977 - Ethics 88 (1):36-49.
Conceptual Ethics I.Alexis Burgess & David Plunkett - 2013 - Philosophy Compass 8 (12):1091-1101.

View all 34 references / Add more references