Philosophical Review 128 (4):387-422 (2019)

Authors
Daniela Dover
University of California, Los Angeles
Abstract
It is widely believed that we ought not to criticize others for wrongs that we ourselves have committed. The author draws out and challenges some of the background assumptions about the practice of criticism that underlie our attraction to this claim, such as the tendency to think of criticism either as a social sanction or as a didactic intervention. The author goes on to offer a taxonomy of cases in which the moral legitimacy of criticism is challenged on the grounds that the critic him- or herself engages in the behavior that he or she criticizes in others. The author argues that, in each type of case, the would-be critics should not constrain their participation in moral discourse on the grounds that they are not themselves innocent of the wrongdoing they criticize in others.
Keywords criticism  blame  hypocrisy  standing  authority
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1215/00318108-7697850
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,464
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Freedom and Resentment.Peter Strawson - 1962 - Proceedings of the British Academy 48:187-211.
Moral Dimensions: Permissibility, Meaning, Blame.Thomas Scanlon - 2008 - Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Hypocrisy and the Standing to Blame.Kyle G. Fritz & Daniel Miller - 2018 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 99 (1):118-139.

View all 26 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Epistemic Blame.Cameron Boult - 2021 - Philosophy Compass 16 (8):e12762.
The Paradox of Self-Blame.Patrick Todd & Brian Rabern - 2022 - American Philosophical Quarterly 59 (2):111–125.
Salience Principles for Democracy.Susanna Siegel - forthcoming - In Sophie Archer (ed.), Salience. Taylor and Francis.
Praising Without Standing.Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen - 2022 - The Journal of Ethics 26 (2):229-246.

View all 16 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Status of Moral Status.Benjamin Sachs - 2011 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 92 (1):87-104.
Talk About Talk About Talk About Art.Allan Shields - 1967 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 26 (2):187-192.
To Walk or Not to Walk.D. A. Coady & S. Chopra - 2009 - Res Publica (Parkville, Vic.) 18 (1):20-23.
Entitled to Speak: Talk in the Classroom. [REVIEW]Christine Doddington - 2001 - Studies in Philosophy and Education 20 (3):267-274.
Three Conditions of Contemporary Social Philosophy Criticism.Boris Podoroga - 2018 - Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences 6:135-139.
The Preacher's Challenge: To Walk the Talk.Tom Sibley - 2007 - Kairos: Evangelical Journal of Theology 1 (1):107-115.
Two Concepts of Rules.John Rawls & Andrei Korbut - 2013 - Russian Sociological Review 12 (2):16-40.
Criticism and Method.Denis Dutton - 1973 - British Journal of Aesthetics 13 (3):232-242.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2019-10-12

Total views
237 ( #47,875 of 2,520,747 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
39 ( #22,140 of 2,520,747 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes