Faith and Philosophy 4 (2):202-206 (1987)

Abstract
Clement Dore has offered a demonstration that God is possible. This is important because the Ontological Argument shows that if God is possible, it is necessarily true that God exists. Dore’s demonstration parallels Descartes’s Meditation V argument: (roughly) God by definition has all perfections; but (Dore proposes) possible existence is a perfection; therefore, God is possible. However, Leibniz recognized that Descartes’s argument is incomplete, omitting proof that the concept of God is consistent. Dore’s demonstration fails for just this reason. Dore’s defense misses this objection. If the concept of God is consistent, that directly establishes that God is possible, making assumptions about perfections irrelevant
Keywords Contemporary Philosophy  Philosophy and Religion
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 0739-7046
DOI 10.5840/faithphil19874216
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 53,682
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

More on the Possibility of God.Clement Dore - 1990 - Faith and Philosophy 7 (3):340-343.
Existence as a Perfection.Michael Wreen - 2017 - History of Philosophy & Logical Analysis 20 (1):161-172.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

More on the Possibility of God.Clement Dore - 1990 - Faith and Philosophy 7 (3):340-343.
A Reply to Professor Rowe.Clement Dore - 1986 - Faith and Philosophy 3 (3):314-318.
Leibniz and the Possibility of God's Existence.David Werther - 1996 - Religious Studies 32 (1):37 - 48.
Alvin Plantinga on the Ontological Argument.William L. Rowe - 2009 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 65 (2):87 - 92.
The Possibility of God.Clement Dore - 1984 - Faith and Philosophy 1 (3):303-315.
On Which 'God' Should Be the Target of a 'Proof of God's Existence'.David Twetten - 2006 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 8:75-80.
God, Possibility, and Kant.Robert Merrihew Adams - 2000 - Faith and Philosophy 17 (4):425-440.
Divine Unsurpassability.Klaas Kraay - 2007 - Philosophia 35 (3-4):293-300.
Does God's Existence Need Proof?Richard Messer - 1993 - Oxford University Press.
The Importance of Cartesian Triangles: A New Look at Descartes's Ontological Argument.M. V. Dougherty - 2002 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 10 (1):35 – 62.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2011-01-09

Total views
36 ( #271,771 of 2,349,533 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #331,095 of 2,349,533 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes