Can scientific development and children's cognitive development be the same process?

Philosophy of Science 66 (4):565-578 (1999)

Stephen M. Downes
University of Utah
In this paper I assess Gopnik and Meltzoff's developmental psychology of science as a contribution to the understanding of scientific development. I focus on two specific aspects of Gopnik and Meltzoff's approach: the relation between their views and recapitulationist views of ontogeny and phylogeny in biology, and their overall conception of cognition as a set of veridical processes. First, I discuss several issues that arise from their appeal to evolutionary biology, focusing specifically on the role of distinctions between ontogeny and phylogeny when appealing to biology for theoretical support. Second, I argue that to presuppose that cognition is veridical or "truth-tropic" can compromise attempts to understand scientific cognition both throughout history and in the present. Finally, I briefly sketch an evolutionary approach to understanding scientific development that contrasts with Gopnik and Meltzoff's
Keywords Children  Cognition  Development  Process  Science  Gopnik, A  Meltzoff, A
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1086/392755
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 38,928
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Concepts in Change.Anna-Mari Rusanen & Samuli Pöyhönen - 2013 - Science and Education: Academic Journal of Ushynsky University 22 (6):1389-1403.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
55 ( #129,831 of 2,319,330 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
9 ( #118,774 of 2,319,330 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature