Philosophical Studies 131 (1):1-23 (2006)

Authors
Janice Dowell
Syracuse University
Abstract
Perhaps more controversial than whether physicalism is true is what exactly would have to be true for physicalism to be true. Everyone agrees that, intuitively at least, physicalism is the thesis that there is nothing over and above the physical. The disagreements arise in how to get beyond this intuitive formulation. Until about ten years ago, participants in this debate were concerned primarily with answering two questions. First, what is it for a property, kind, relation, or individual to be a physical one?
Keywords Philosophy   Philosophy   Logic   Epistemology   Philosophy of Mind   Philosophy of Religion
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11098-006-6641-y
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 61,089
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Physicalism.Daniel Stoljar - 2015 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Defining Physicalism.Alyssa Ney - 2008 - Philosophy Compass 3 (5):1033-1048.

View all 11 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
184 ( #55,196 of 2,439,698 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
7 ( #95,932 of 2,439,698 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes