Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2001)
The Liar Paradox is an argument that arrives at a contradiction by reasoning about a Liar Sentence. The classical Liar Sentence is the self-referential sentence “This sentence is false.”
|Keywords||Tarski global truth predicate Kripke Quine Russell Barwise Etchemendy Strengthened Liar|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
On the Storeyed Revenge of Strengthened Liars, and the Contrary Finality of No-Proposition Resolutions.Jordan Howard Sobel - manuscript
The Early Arabic Liar: The Liar Paradox in the Islamic World From the Mid-Ninth to the Mid-Thirteenth Centuries Ce.Ahmed Alwishah & David Sanson - 2009 - Vivarium (1):97-127.
A Proof of the (Strengthened) Liar Formula in a Semantical Extension of Peano Arithmetic.Jeffrey Ketland - 2000 - Analysis 60 (1):1–4.
Truthmaker Gaps and the No-No Paradox.Patrick Greenough - 2011 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 82 (3):547 - 563.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads44 ( #117,283 of 2,163,624 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #129,236 of 2,163,624 )
How can I increase my downloads?