Zangwill, Moderate Formalism, and Another Look at Kant's Aesthetic

Kantian Review 15 (2):90-117 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In recent years Nick Zangwill has gone a long way in championing a moderate aesthetic formalism in an attempt to accommodate those objects that many of us call beautiful despite their lack of any formal beauty. While there is some dispute in the literature about the extent to which Kant can be interpreted as an aesthetic formalist, the appeal of his famous distinction between free and dependent beauty should present a fairly natural ally for Zangwill's project. Indeed, such an alliance has been expressed by Zangwill, who first reaches for this ‘invaluable but misunderstood and underappreciated distinction’ in his ‘Feasible aesthetic formalism’ . Here, Zangwill claims that this essential distinction can be cut loose from Kant's terminology and views about aesthetic judgement. More recently he expresses more strongly that ‘Kant was also a moderate formalist, who opposes extreme formalism when he distinguished free and dependent beauty in §16 of the Critique of Judgement’ . Yet, a decade on from the initial suggestion, there has been little further exploration or elucidation of this move, or indeed this potential characterization of Kant's aesthetics. It is the aim of this paper to begin to address that deficiency by identifying the extent to which a moderate formalist position is available in Kant's aesthetic. I will suggest that Kant's account does not require substantial modification in order to cast him as a moderate formalist. Taking the time to isolate the plausible grounds for characterizing Kant's aesthetic in this way, this discussion will enable us to explore some of the rival interpretations of his work such that we may also identify the kind of Kantian the moderate formalist is likely to be

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,616

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Feasible aesthetic formalism.Nick Zangwill - 1999 - Noûs 33 (4):610-629.
In Defence of Moderate Aesthetic Formalism.Nick Zangwill - 2000 - Philosophical Quarterly 50 (201):476-493.
Defusing anti-formalist arguments.Nick Zangwill - 2000 - British Journal of Aesthetics 40 (3):376-383.
Moderate formalism as a theory of the aesthetic.Glenn Parsons - 2004 - Journal of Aesthetic Education 38 (3):19-35.
Kant's Aesthetic Revolution.Albert Hofstadter - 1975 - Journal of Religious Ethics 3 (2):171 - 191.
The Purposiveness of Form: A Reading of Kant's Aesthetic Formalism.Rachel Zuckert - 2006 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 44 (4):599-622.
Kant and Greenberg's varieties of aesthetic formalism.Paul Crowther - 1984 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 42 (4):442-445.
The concept of the aesthetic.Nick Zangwill - 1998 - European Journal of Philosophy 6 (1):78–93.
Art in and out of context.Daniel A. Siedell - 2011 - Journal of Aesthetic Education 45 (1):118-122.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-02-02

Downloads
83 (#185,592)

6 months
6 (#203,358)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Kant's Musical Antiformalism.James O. Young - 2020 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 78 (2):171-182.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Critique of judgement.Immanuel Kant - 2007 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by Nicholas Walker.
Categories of Art.Kendall L. Walton - 1970 - Philosophical Review 79 (3):334-367.
Kant and the Claims of Taste.Paul Guyer - 1979 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
The Metaphysics of Beauty.Nick Zangwill - 2001 - Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
An ontology of art.Gregory Currie - 1989 - New York: St. Martin's Press.

View all 29 references / Add more references