Kantian Review 15 (2):90-117 (2010)
In recent years Nick Zangwill has gone a long way in championing a moderate aesthetic formalism in an attempt to accommodate those objects that many of us call beautiful despite their lack of any formal beauty. While there is some dispute in the literature about the extent to which Kant can be interpreted as an aesthetic formalist, the appeal of his famous distinction between free and dependent beauty should present a fairly natural ally for Zangwill's project. Indeed, such an alliance has been expressed by Zangwill, who first reaches for this ‘invaluable but misunderstood and underappreciated distinction’ in his ‘Feasible aesthetic formalism’ . Here, Zangwill claims that this essential distinction can be cut loose from Kant's terminology and views about aesthetic judgement. More recently he expresses more strongly that ‘Kant was also a moderate formalist, who opposes extreme formalism when he distinguished free and dependent beauty in §16 of the Critique of Judgement’ . Yet, a decade on from the initial suggestion, there has been little further exploration or elucidation of this move, or indeed this potential characterization of Kant's aesthetics. It is the aim of this paper to begin to address that deficiency by identifying the extent to which a moderate formalist position is available in Kant's aesthetic. I will suggest that Kant's account does not require substantial modification in order to cast him as a moderate formalist. Taking the time to isolate the plausible grounds for characterizing Kant's aesthetic in this way, this discussion will enable us to explore some of the rival interpretations of his work such that we may also identify the kind of Kantian the moderate formalist is likely to be
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
In Defence of Moderate Aesthetic Formalism.Nick Zangwill - 2000 - Philosophical Quarterly 50 (201):476-493.
Defusing Anti-Formalist Arguments.Nick Zangwill - 2000 - British Journal of Aesthetics 40 (3):376-383.
The Classical Trinity and Kant's Aesthetic Formalism.Jennifer A. McMahon - 2010 - Critical Horizons 11 (3):419-441.
Aesthetic Formalism, Reactions and Solutions.Khosrow Bagheri Noaparast & Mohammad Zoheir Bagheri Noaparast - 2011 - Wisdom and Philosophy 6 (4):101-112.
Moderate Formalism as a Theory of the Aesthetic.Glenn Parsons - 2004 - Journal of Aesthetic Education 38 (3):19-35.
In Defence of Extreme Formalism About Inorganic Nature: Reply to Parsons.Nick Zangwill - 2005 - British Journal of Aesthetics 45 (2):185-191.
Formal Natural Beauty.Nick Zangwill - 2001 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 101 (2):209–224.
The Purposiveness of Form: A Reading of Kant's Aesthetic Formalism.Rachel Zuckert - 2006 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 44 (4):599-622.
Kant and Greenberg's Varieties of Aesthetic Formalism.Paul Crowther - 1984 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 42 (4):442-445.
A Purely Formal Ethical Theory in Kant's Groundwork?Wayne A. Mastin - 1991 - Philosophy and Theology 6 (1):3-20.
Added to index2011-02-02
Total downloads43 ( #121,308 of 2,171,911 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #326,614 of 2,171,911 )
How can I increase my downloads?