Philosophical Studies 145 (1):69 - 88 (2009)
This paper is an exploration of the nature of what is perhaps the most widely recognized justification for inflicting harm on human beings: the appeal to defense (self-defense and other-defense). I develop and defend a rights-based account of the appeal to defense that takes into account whether and to what degree both the aggressor and his potential victim are morally responsible for the relevant threat. However, unlike most extant rights-based accounts, mine is not a forfeiture account. That is, I do not attempt to explain the permissibility of defense in terms of the aggressor’s loss of a right not to be harmed. Instead I appeal directly to the fact that defense in the relevant cases prevents the aggressor from infringing upon the rights of his potential victim. Accordingly, I call my account a “prevention account.”.
|Keywords||Moral responsibility Rights Self-defense Other-defense|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
The Ethics of Killing: Problems at the Margins of Life.Jeff McMahan - 2002 - Oup Usa.
The Basis of Moral Liability to Defensive Killing.Jeff McMahan - 2005 - Philosophical Issues 15 (1):386–405.
Citations of this work BETA
Similar books and articles
The Paradox of Self-Defense: Saving Oneself by Harming Another.Whitley R. P. Kaufman - 2009 - Lexington Books.
The Distributive Justice Theory of Self-Defense: A Response to Whitley Kaufman.Re'em Segev - 2008 - Ethics and International Affairs 22 (1).
Killing, Self-Defense, and Bad Luck.Richard B. Miller - 2009 - Journal of Religious Ethics 37 (1):131-158.
Self-Defense, Culpability, and Distributive Justice.Phillip Montague - 2010 - Law and Philosophy 29 (1):75-91.
Terrorism, Self-Defense, and the Killing of the Innocent.Whitley R. P. Kaufman - 2004 - Social Philosophy Today 20:41-52.
Added to index2009-03-28
Total downloads101 ( #49,285 of 2,158,204 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #195,104 of 2,158,204 )
How can I increase my downloads?