Analysis 54 (1):61 - 64 (1994)

Authors
Theodore Drange
West Virginia University
Abstract
This is a reply to B. H. Slater's article "Liar Syllogisms and Related Paradoxes" (Analysis 51, 146-153), which raised an objection to one of the arguments considered in my article "Liar Syllogisms" (Analysis 50, 1-7). Slater's objection is shown to be a failure. In effect, the paradoxicality of liar syllogisms is vindicated.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/analys/54.1.61
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 64,077
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Self-Reference and Validity.Stephen Read - 1979 - Synthese 42 (2):265 - 274.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Reference in Conceptual Realism.Nino B. Cocchiarella - 1998 - Synthese 114 (2):169-202.
Self-Referential Arguments in Philosophy.Elke Brendel - 2007 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 74 (1):177-197.
Quantifiers in Ontology.Charles F. Kielkopf - 1977 - Studia Logica 36 (4):301-307.
Sublime Kinetic Melody: Kelly Slater and the Extreme Spectator.Carl Thomen - 2010 - Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 4 (3):319-331.
Rejoinder to Mawson.Brian Zamulinski - 2004 - Religious Studies 40 (3):365-366.
Reply to Slater and Garcia-Carpintero.Fred Dretske - 1994 - Mind and Language 9 (2):203-8.
Russellianism and Referential Uses of Descriptions.Neil Feit - 2003 - Philosophical Studies 115 (2):99 - 122.
Free Choice, Self-Referential Arguments, and the New Natural Law.Jennifer A. Herdt - 1998 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 72 (4):581-600.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2011-05-29

Total views
70 ( #154,562 of 2,454,557 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #449,377 of 2,454,557 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes