Interpreting Heidegger on Das man


Authors
Hubert Dreyfus
University of California, Berkeley
Abstract
In their debate over my interpretation of Heidegger's account of das Man in Being and Time, Frederick Olafson and Taylor Carman agree that Heidegger's various characterizations of das Man are inconsistent. Olafson champions an existentialist/ontic account of das Man as a distorted mode of being?with. Carman defends a Wittgensteinian/ontological account of das Man as Heidegger's name for the social norms that make possible everyday intelligibility. For Olafson, then, das Man is a privative mode of Dasein, while for Carman it makes up an important aspect of Dasein's positive constitution. Neither interpreter takes seriously the other's account, though both acknowledge both readings are possible. How should one choose between these two interpretations? I suggest that we choose the interpretation that identifies the phenomenon the work is examining, gives the most internally consistent account of that phenomenon, and shows the compatibility of this account with the rest of the work
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/00201749508602398
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 47,182
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

On Being Social: A Reply to Olafson.Taylor Carman - 1994 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 37 (2):203 – 223.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Heidegger, Sociality, and Human Agency.B. Scot Rousse - 2016 - European Journal of Philosophy 24 (2):417-451.
Temporal Finitude and Finitude of Possibility: The Double Meaning of Death in Being and Time.Havi Carel - 2007 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 15 (4):541 – 556.
The Problem of Das Man—A Simmelian Solution.Carleton B. Christensen - 2012 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 55 (3):262-288.
Das Man and Distantiality in Being and Time.David Egan - 2012 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 55 (3):289-306.

View all 10 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Heidegger on Presence: A Reply.Frederick A. Olafson - 1996 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 39 (3 & 4):421 – 426.
Heidegger la Wittgenstein or 'Coping' with Professor Dreyfus.Frederick A. Olafson - 1994 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 37 (1):45 – 64.
Individualism, Subjectivity, and Presence: A Response to Taylor Carman.Frederick A. Olafson - 1994 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 37 (3):331 – 337.
Heidegger's Theory of Space: A Critique of Dreyfus.Yoko Arisaka - 1995 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 38 (4):455 – 467.
Heidegger and the Source(s) of Intelligibility.Pierre Keller & David Weberman - 1998 - Continental Philosophy Review 31 (4):369-386.
Gender and Time: Revisiting the Question of Dasein's Neutrality.Kevin Aho - 2007 - Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 12 (1):137-155.
On Being Social: A Reply to Olafson.Taylor Carman - 1994 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 37 (2):203 – 223.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-30

Total views
169 ( #48,492 of 2,289,446 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
11 ( #75,240 of 2,289,446 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature