Personal knowledge and study participation

Journal of Medical Ethics 40 (7):471-474 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Scientists in earlier times considered personal research participation an essential component of their work. Exposing themselves to untested interventions was seen as the most ethical way to gauge the human response to those interventions. The practice was also educational, for it generated useful information that helped researchers plan subsequent human studies. Self-experimentation was eventually replaced by more comprehensive ethical codes governing human research. But it is time to bring back the practice of self-experimentation, albeit in modified form. Through serving as a study subject, investigators and other research professionals can obtain valuable information about their work

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,122

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Personal knowledge.Michael Polanyi - 1958 - Chicago,: University of Chicago Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-22

Downloads
19 (#717,158)

6 months
2 (#889,309)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Scientific research is a moral duty.J. Harris - 2005 - Journal of Medical Ethics 31 (4):242-248.
The Obligation to Participate in Biomedical Research.G. Owen Schaefer, Ezekiel J. Emanuel & Alan Wertheimer - 2009 - Journal of the American Medical Association 302 (1):67-72.
In Whose Interests?Stuart Rennie - 2011 - Hastings Center Report 41 (2):40-47.
Non-completion and informed consent.Alan Wertheimer - 2014 - Journal of Medical Ethics 40 (2):127-130.

View all 10 references / Add more references