Australasian Journal of Philosophy 83 (3):373 – 393 (2005)
First order logic does not distinguish between different forms of universal generalization; in this paper I argue that lawlike and accidental generalizations (broadly construed) have a different logical form, and that this distinction is syntactically marked in English. I then consider the relevance of this broader conception of lawlikeness to the philosophy of science.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
On Quantifier Domain Restriction.Jason Stanley & Zoltán Gendler Szabó - 2000 - Mind and Language 15 (2&3):219--61.
A More General Theory of Definite Descriptions.Richard Sharvy - 1980 - Philosophical Review 89 (4):607-624.
Plurals, All, and the Nonuniformity of Collective Predication.C. Brisson - 2003 - Linguistics and Philosophy 26 (2):129-184.
Defending Laws in the Social Sciences.Harold Kincaid - 1990 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 20 (1):56?83.
Citations of this work BETA
The but Not All: A Partitive Account of Plural Definite Descriptions.Berit Brogaard - 2007 - Mind and Language 22 (4):402–426.
Similar books and articles
Logical Forms.Oswaldo Chateaubriand - 2000 - The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 2000:161-182.
Causal Regularities in the Biological World of Contingent Distributions.C. Kenneth Waters - 1998 - Biology and Philosophy 13 (1):5-36.
Allometries and Scaling Laws Interpreted as Laws: A Reply to Elgin.Jani Raerinne - 2011 - Biology and Philosophy 26 (1):99-111.
Logical Form.Christopher Menzel - 1998 - In Edward Craig (ed.), Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Routledge.
The Logic of Valuing.Boudewijn de Bruin - 2009 - In Thomas Boylan & Ruvin Gekker (eds.), Economics, Rational Choice and Normative Philosophy. Routledge.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads213 ( #17,898 of 2,157,997 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #89,427 of 2,157,997 )
How can I increase my downloads?