The virtues of ignorance

Journal of Philosophy 86 (7):373-384 (1989)
In The Virtues of Ignorance the author demonstrates that classical theories of virtue are flawed and developes a consequentialist theory of virtue. ;Virtues are excellences of character. They are traits which are considered to be valuable in some way. A person who is virtuous is one who has a tendency to act well. Classical philosophers, such as Plato and Aristotle, believed that virtues, as human excellences, could not involve ignorance in any way. On their view, the virtuous agent, when acting well, knows what she is doing under the description which makes the action conform to virtue. For example, the generous person must know that she is, in fact, helping others in need. Yet, there is a class of virtues, the "virtues of ignorance," which essentially involve ignorance. For example, modesty requires that the agent underestimate self worth. In the first portion of the dissertation, this class of virtues is discussed, and problems raised for the traditional theories of virtue. ;In the latter portion of the dissertation, the author outlines a consequentialist theory of virtue. It is argued that the only hope of developing a unified theory of virtue is along consequentialist lines, because attempts at identifying the psychological state which is necessary for virtue have failed. On a consequentialist theory, a virtue is defined in terms of its consequences. Thus, the moral quality of the character trait is determined by how much good it brings about . The virtues of ignorance can easily be accommodated in such a theory because these traits do bring about good, even if the agent possessing the trait acts out of ignorance
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI jphil198986748
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 27,141
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
What is Ignorance?Rik Peels - 2010 - Philosophia 38 (1):57-67.
The Illusion of Discretion.Kurt Sylvan - 2016 - Synthese 193 (6):1635-1665.
What Does Ethics Have to Do with Leadership?Michael P. Levine & Jacqueline Boaks - 2013 - Journal of Business Ethics 124 (2):1-18.
The Conflation of Moral and Epistemic Virtue.Julia Driver - 2003 - Metaphilosophy 34 (3):367-383.

View all 11 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Culpability and Ignorance.Gideon Rosen - 2002 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 103 (1):61–84.
The Virtues of Ignorance.Wayne Ouderkirk - 2010 - Environmental Ethics 32 (1):107-110.
Emotions Among the Virtues of the Christian Life.Robert C. Roberts - 1992 - Journal of Religious Ethics 20 (1):37 - 68.
Tracing Culpable Ignorance.Rik Peels - 2011 - Logos and Episteme 2 (4):575-582.
Does Moral Virtue Require Knowledge? A Response to Julia Driver.Michael Jeffrey Winter - 2012 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 15 (4):533 - 546.
Driver's Virtues.Michael Slote - 2004 - Utilitas 16 (1):22-32.
Ignorance and Virtue.Ronald Sandler - 2005 - Philosophical Papers 34 (2):261-272.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

230 ( #15,808 of 2,163,620 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

25 ( #14,168 of 2,163,620 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums