Real Presence?

Ars Disputandi 12:61-65 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX


In a recent Chapter, Alexander Pruss attempts to defend the traditional Christian doctrine of Eucharistic Transubstantiation. It is objected that his case is unconvincing, since it involves accidents and dispositions existing without subjects, and an inadequate account of the Eucharistic presence of Christ. It is argued that the doctrine can yet be maintained, along Aristotelian-Thomistic lines.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,347

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Real Presence?Peter Drum - 2012 - Ars Disputandi: The Online Journal for Philosophy of Religion 12.
Transubstantiation and the Real Presence.Christopher Hughes Conn - 2003 - Philosophy and Theology 15 (2):333-351.
Eucharist: metaphysical miracle or institutional fact?H. E. Baber - 2013 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 74 (3):333-352.
Real Presence in the Eucharist and time-travel.Martin Pickup - 2015 - Religious Studies 51 (3):379-389.
After Heidegger: Transubstantiation.Laurence Paul Hemming - 2000 - Heythrop Journal 41 (2):170–186.
The real presence.H. E. Baber - 2013 - Religious Studies 49 (1):19-33.
The Eucharist : real presence and real absence.Alexander R. Pruss - 2008 - In Thomas P. Flint & Michael Rea (eds.), The Oxford handbook of philosophical theology. New York: Oxford University Press.
Varieties of presence.Alva Noë - 2012 - Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
The Eucharistic Symbols of the Presence of the Lord.Daniel Liderbach - 1987 - Philosophy and Theology 1 (3):225-241.


Added to PP

47 (#340,845)

6 months
20 (#133,501)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references