Green Reason

Environmental Ethics 12 (3):195-210 (1990)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Exclusively instrumental notions of rationality not only reinforce attitudes conducive to the destruction of the natural world, but also undermine attempts to construct environmental ethics that involve more harmonious relationships between humans and nature. Deep ecologists and other ecological critics of instrumental rationality generally prefer some kind of spiritual orientation to nature. In this paper I argue against both instrumental rationalists and ecological spiritualists in favor of a communicative rationality which encompasses the natural world. I draw upon both critical theory and recent scientific intimations of agency in nature.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Green Reason.John S. Dryzek - 1990 - Environmental Ethics 12 (3):195-210.
Rethinking Critical Theory.Kevin DeLuca - 2001 - Environmental Ethics 23 (3):307-325.
Rethinking Critical Theory.Kevin DeLuca - 2001 - Environmental Ethics 23 (3):307-325.
Habermas on Nature.Yogi Hale Hendlin & Konrad Ott - 2016 - Environmental Ethics 38 (2):183-208.
The Rationality of Biofuel Certification: A Critical Examination of EU Biofuel Policy.A. J. K. Pols - 2015 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 28 (4):667-681.
Handlungstypen und Kriterien. Zu Habermas' "Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns".Andreas Dorschel - 1990 - Zeitschrift für Philosophische Forschung 44 (2):220-252.
Communication and rationality.Georg Meggle - 2002 - Manuscrito 25 (2):291-312.
The Myth of Instrumental Rationality.Joseph Raz - 2005 - Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 1 (1):28.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
73 (#221,697)

6 months
8 (#347,798)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?