Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 18 (1):27-45 (2015)

Abstract
This paper argues that economic agents, including corporations, have the duty to further justice, not just a duty merely to comply with laws and do their share. The duty to further justice is the requirement to assist in the establishment of just arrangements when they do not exist in society. The paper is grounded in liberal theory and draws heavily on one liberal theorist, Kant. We show that the duty to further justice must be interpreted as a duty of virtue that is owed. This means that the duty is not enforceable but that violating this duty is still wrong and not merely non-virtuous. Our analysis has consequences for the morality of commercial life. It is often suggested that the morality of the market is a special, restricted morality that is leaner than the morality that agents must acknowledge outside the market. If our analysis is correct, the duty to further justice cannot be exempted from market morality, even if it is agreed that this must be leaner than the morality outside commercial life. Our analysis also has direct consequences for John Ruggie’s view on the responsibilities of businesses. Ruggie has never explicitly acknowledged a duty on the part of business enterprises to further justice. If our analysis is correct, his view is contradictory in that it presupposes the normative validity of free market enterprise yet shrinks from taking into account the conditions of its possibility
Keywords Duty to further justice  Ruggie framework  Business morality  Liberalism  Kant  Doctrine of right  Doctrine of virtue  Governance gap
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s10677-014-9504-1
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 52,956
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

World Poverty and Human Rights.Thomas Pogge - 2002 - Ethics and International Affairs 19 (1):1-7.
Political Liberalism.J. Rawls - 1995 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 57 (3):596-598.
Is Business Bluffing Ethical?Albert Z. Carr - forthcoming - Essentials of Business Ethics.

View all 25 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Grounding Positive Duties in Commercial Life.Wim Dubbink & Luc Van Liedekerke - 2014 - Journal of Business Ethics 120 (4):527-539.
Kantian Practical Love.Melissa Seymour Fahmy - 2010 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 91 (3):313-331.
A Duty to Adopt?Daniel Friedrich - 2013 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 30 (1):25-39.
Legislative Duty and the Independence of Law.J. H. Bogart - 1987 - Law and Philosophy 6 (2):187 - 203.
Global Distributive Justice and the Corporate Duty to Aid.Kevin T. Jackson - 1993 - Journal of Business Ethics 12 (7):547 - 551.
Kant on International Distributive Justice.Sylvie Loriaux - 2007 - Journal of Global Ethics 3 (3):281 – 301.
Risky Rescues and the Duty to Blow the Whistle.Wim Vandekerckhove & Eva E. Tsahuridu - 2010 - Journal of Business Ethics 97 (3):365 - 380.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2014-03-30

Total views
35 ( #277,929 of 2,343,862 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #514,299 of 2,343,862 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes