Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 15 (2):221 - 238 (2012)
AbstractIn latter-day discussions on corporate morality, duties of commission are fiercely debated. Moral institutionalists argue that duties of commission—such as a duty of assistance—overstep the boundaries of moral duty owed by economic agents. " Moral institutionalism" is a newly coined term for a familiar position on market morality. It maintains that market morality ought to be restricted, excluding all duties of commission. Neo-Classical thinkers such as Baumol and Homann defend it most eloquently. They underpin their position with concerns that go to the core of liberalism—the dominant western political theory that sustains the ideals of both the free market and the free, rational person. Those authors claim that liberalism calls for a fully differentiated market because it resents the politicization of the market. Fully differentiated markets exclude duties of commission. They also claim that full differentiation of the market closes the troublesome gap between moral motivation and moral virtue. Full differentiation redeems the promise of "easy virtue". In this paper moral institutionalism will be rejected from a Kantian point of view, mostly inspired by Herman's thesis on the invisibility of morality. Liberalism may perhaps ban the politicization of the market; it does not forbid its moralization. The idea of a fully differentiated market must also be rejected because it is either morally over-demanding (to the morally autonomous person) or morally hazardous (to the person with failing moral motivation). Contrary to what the moral institutionalists claim, right action, morally, is actually quite difficult in fully differentiated markets
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Similar books and articles
Abstract Of: "Toward a Theory of Bribery" [with Commentaries].John R. Danley, Kendall D'Andrade & Scott Turow - 1983 - Business and Professional Ethics Journal 3 (1):79 - 86.
The Animal in Morality. Justifying Duties to Animals in Kantian Moral Philosophy.F. E. Kaldewaij - unknown
Kant's Ethics and Duties to Oneself.Lara Denis - 1997 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 78 (4):321–348.
Moralizing Markets.Richard Bellamy - 1994 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 8 (3):341-357.
On the Existence of Duties to the Self.Paul Schofield - 2015 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 90 (3):505-528.
Adam Smith and Immanuel Kant: On Markets, Duties, and Moral Sentiments.Mark D. White - 2010 - Forum for Social Economics 39 (1):53-60.
Animality and Agency: A Kantian Approach to Abortion.Lara Denis - 2008 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 76 (1):117-37.
A Kantian Moral Duty for the Soon-to-Be Demented to Commit Suicide.Dennis R. Cooley - 2007 - American Journal of Bioethics 7 (6):37 – 44.
A Fiduciary Argument Against Stakeholder Theory.Alexei M. Marcoux - 2003 - Business Ethics Quarterly 13 (1):1-24.
Collectives' Duties and Collectivisation Duties.Stephanie Collins - 2013 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 91 (2):231-248.
Morality and the Market in China: Some Contemporary Views.John J. Hanafin - 2002 - Business Ethics Quarterly 12 (1):1-18.
The Moderate Communitarian Individual and the Primacy of Duties.J. O. Famakinwa - 2010 - Theoria 76 (2):152-166.
References found in this work
Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy.Jürgen Habermas (ed.) - 1996 - Polity.
Self-Constitution: Agency, Identity, and Integrity.Christine M. Korsgaard - 2009 - Oxford University Press.
Citations of this work
The Responsibilities and Role of Business in Relation to Society: Back to Basics?Nien-hê Hsieh - 2017 - Business Ethics Quarterly 27 (2):293-314.
Grounding Positive Duties in Commercial Life.Wim Dubbink & Luc Van Liedekerke - 2014 - Journal of Business Ethics 120 (4):527-539.
Food for Deliberation : Philosophical Reflections on Responsible Innovation in the Business Context.Teunis Brand - 2020 - Dissertation, Wageningen University and Research