Authors
Abstract
Moral purism is a commonly held view on moral worthiness and how to identify it in concrete cases. Moral purists long for a moral world in which people—at least sometimes—act morally worthy, but in concrete cases they systematically discount good deeds as grounded in self-interest. Moral purism evokes moral cynicism. Moral cynicism is a problem, both in society at large and the business world. Moral cynicism can be fought by refuting moral purism. This article takes issue with moral purism. The common strategy to tackle moral purism is to reject the exclusion thesis which states that self-interest and the ‘pure’ moral motive exclude each other. We develop a different strategy. We argue that moral purists are mistaken in the way they judge moral worthiness in concrete cases. They employ the wrong procedure and the wrong criteria. We develop a proper procedure and proper criteria. We build on Kant, who we argue is unfairly regarded as the champion of moral purism. In order to see how Kant can develop a consistent philosophy, the exclusion thesis must be embedded in Kant’s transcendental philosophy. Properly embedded, Kant turns out to be both anti-purist and anti-cynical.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10551-019-04167-y
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 52,956
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Moral Judgement of the Child.Jean Piaget - 1933 - Philosophy 8 (31):373-374.
The Practice of Moral Judgment.Paul Guyer - 1993 - Ethics 106 (2):404-423.
Kant’s Ethical Thought.Allen W. Wood - 2001 - Philosophical Quarterly 51 (203):259-261.
The Scope of Moral Requirement.Barbara Herman - 2001 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 30 (3):227-256.

View all 20 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Kant and Moral Demandingness.Marcel van Ackeren & Martin Sticker - 2015 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 18 (1):75-89.
Moral Literacy.Barbara Herman - 2007 - Harvard University Press.
Motive Zu Moralischem Handeln.Christopher Lumer - 2002 - Analyse & Kritik 24 (2):163-188.
Moral Fanaticism and the Holocaust: A Defense of Kant Against Silber.Lee F. Kerckhove - 1994 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 1 (1):21-25.
Mixed Motives and Ethical Decisions in Business.Vincent Di Norcia & Joyce Tigner - 2000 - Journal of Business Ethics 25 (1):1 - 13.
Moral Motivation and Moral Action.Julie Ane Tannenbaum - 2002 - Dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles
Kierkegaard on Purity of Heart.Stephen R. Munzer - 2016 - International Philosophical Quarterly 56 (3):315-336.
Purity (Benjamin with Kant).Carlo Salzani - 2010 - History of European Ideas 36 (4):438-447.
The Motives for Moral Credit.Grant Rozeboom - 2017 - Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 11 (3):1-30.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2019-05-14

Total views
10 ( #811,038 of 2,343,714 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #514,299 of 2,343,714 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes