Testing Universal Gravitation in the Laboratory, or the Significance of Research on the mean Density of the Earth and Big G, 1798-1898: Changing Pursuits and long-term methodological-experimental Continuity [Book Review]
This paper seeks to provide a historically well-informed analysis of an important post-Newtonian area of research in experimental physics between 1798 and 1898, namely the determination of the mean density of the earth and, by the end of the nineteenth century, the gravitational constant. Traditionally, research on these matters is seen as a case of ‘puzzle solving.’ In this paper, I show that such focus does not do justice to the evidential significance of eighteenth- and nineteenth-century experimental research on the mean density of the earth and the gravitational constant. As Newton’s theory of universal gravitation was mainly based on astronomical observation, it remained to be shown that Newton’s law of universal gravitation did not break down at terrestrial distances. In this context, Cavendish’ experiment and related nineteenth-century experiments played a decisive role, for they provided converging and increasingly stronger evidence for the universality of Newton’s theory of gravitation. More precisely, I shall argue that, as the accuracy and precision of the experimental apparatuses and the procedures to eliminate external disturbances involved increasingly improved, the empirical support for the universality of Newton’s theory of gravitation improved correspondingly.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
The Anticipation of Necessity: Kant on Kepler's Laws and Universal Gravitation.Scott Tanona - 2000 - Philosophy of Science 67 (3):421-443.
Understanding (in) Newton's Argument for Universal Gravitation.Steffen Ducheyne - 2009 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 40 (2):227 - 258.
The Argument(s) for Universal Gravitation.Steffen Ducheyne - 2006 - Foundations of Science 11 (4):419-447.
Qualities, Properties, and Laws in Newton's Induction.David Marshall Miller - 2009 - Philosophy of Science 76 (5):1052-1063.
Indeterminism, Classical Gravitation and Non-Collision Singularities.Jon Pérez Laraudogoitia - 2001 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 15 (3):269 – 274.
Inferences From Phenomena in Gravitational Physics.William Harper & Robert DiSalle - 1996 - Philosophy of Science 63 (3):54.
Methodological and Epistemic Differences Between Historical Science and Experimental Science.Carol E. Cleland - 2002 - Philosophy of Science 69 (3):447-451.
Newton's Classic Deductions From Phenomena.William Harper - 1990 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1990:183 - 196.
Reproducibility as a Methodological Imperative in Experimental Research.Michael J. Hones - 1990 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1990:585 - 599.
The Reception of Newton's Gravitational Theory by Huygens, Varignon, and Maupertuis: How Normal Science May Be Revolutionary.Kofi Maglo - 2003 - Perspectives on Science 11 (2):135-169.
Newton's Experimentum Crucis Vs. Goethe's Series of Experiments: Implications for the Underdetermination Thesis.James Marcum - unknown
Einstein, Nordstrom, and the Early Demise of Scalar, Lorentz Covariant Theories of Gravitation.John D. Norton - 2007 - Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science 250 (3).
"From the Phenomena of Motions to the Forces of Nature": Hypothesis or Deduction?Howard Stein - 1990 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1990:209 - 222.
Added to index2010-11-18
Total downloads478 ( #3,999 of 2,171,911 )
Recent downloads (6 months)13 ( #24,620 of 2,171,911 )
How can I increase my downloads?