Philosophical Quarterly 22 (86):61-64 (1972)

It is urged (1) that geach is correct in his claim ("assertion", "philosophical review", 74, (1965), Page 449) that what he calls 'the frege point' is logically independent of frege's doctrine that sentences are names of objects, And (2) that frege's 'propositions of begriffsschrift' are neither truths nor falsehoods
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.2307/2218594
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 64,107
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
47 ( #229,176 of 2,454,667 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #449,768 of 2,454,667 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes