Why Reichenbach wasn't entirely wrong, and Poincaré was almost right, about geometric conventionalism

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 96 (C):154-173 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,757

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-11-03

Downloads
70 (#302,389)

6 months
7 (#730,543)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Yemima Ben-Menahem
Shalem College

Citations of this work

Newtonian Equivalence Principles.James Read & Nicholas J. Teh - 2023 - Erkenntnis 88 (8):3479-3503.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Carnap and logical truth.Willard van Orman Quine - 1954 - Synthese 12 (4):350--74.
Glymour and Quine on Theoretical Equivalence.Thomas William Barrett & Hans Halvorson - 2016 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 45 (5):467-483.
Motivating dualities.James Read & Thomas Møller-Nielsen - 2020 - Synthese 197 (1):263-291.
Sophistry about symmetries?Niels C. M. Martens & James Read - 2020 - Synthese 199 (1-2):315-344.

View all 50 references / Add more references